Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 3, 1987No. C0-86-1436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant was arrested for driving while under the influence, and his license was revoked for failing a blood test. The trial court sustained the revocation. We affirm.

FACTS

Officer Robert Molstad arrested appellant William John Smith for driving while under the influence. Molstad read the implied consent advisory to appellant, who agreed to take a breath test. Appellant failed to provide an adequate sample. Because appellant did not furnish a valid breath sample, Molstad again read the implied consent advisory, and appellant agreed to take a blood test. The officer did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haugen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Weise v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Schram v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Lewandowski v. TschidaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Roche v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Lindemann v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Ekong v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API