Legal Opinion

Gary v. USAA Life Insurance Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 17, 2017No. Case No.: PWG-15-1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge

When the Plaintiff, Colonel Robert Gary, made a claim for benefits under a life insurance policy (the “Policy”) that Defendant USAA Life Insurance Co. (“USAA Life”) had issued to his wife Angela Maddox-Gary less than two years earlier, USAA Life denied his claim because Ms. Maddox-Gary had made a misrepresentation in the medical questionnaire interview (“Medical Questionnaire”) that was part of the application process for the Policy. Gary filed suit against USAA Life to recover benefits under the Policy. USAA Life moved for summary…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Mellen v. BuntingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claudy v. USAA Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Sheba S. GopaulDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026
  3. Principal National Life Insurance Company v. ZigmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API