Legal Opinion

Rroctor v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1837PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Eastern Dist. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. This is an action of slander, or jactitation of title. The pleadings and facts of the whole case are so fully set out in the opinion of the court delivered by judge Bullard, that it would be nugatory and tautology to make another statement of the case.

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The petition sets forth, that Reggio sold to Wood and Richardson certain tracts of land, in the parish of St. Bernard; that shortly afterwards Wood sold to his co-proprietor, Richardson, his undivided, moiety of the land, with that of one hundred and fifty slaves, among whom were forty-four declared to have been purchased by them of Carter; that on the 25th June, 1822, Richardson sold and conveyed to the plaintiff his undivided share of the land, and on the 10th of April, following, he sold him the residue, together with fifty-eight slaves; that afterwards, in 1824, Richardson, Reggio, and…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Siegel v. HelisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Dalton v. WickliffeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. City of Shreveport v. KahnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. Young v. Town of Morgan CitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Millaudon v. M'DonoughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API