Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hinote v. Owens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 8, 2017No. 1160268Published

1Dissent

SELLERS, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent.

In Oehmig v. Johnson, 638 So.2d 846 (Ala. 1994), the purported grantee of real property in fee simple sought to quiet title as against the purported owners of the mineral rights in the property. In discussing the rule of repose, which the grantee had asserted in support of his quiet-title action, this Court said:

"The rule of repose is 'a defensive matter' and 'is unlike adverse possession, which affirmatively establishes title.' Boshell v. Keith, 418 So.2d 89, 92 (Ala. 1982). The rule of repose has been described as the 'running of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boshell v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Oehmig v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Harrison v. Alabama Forever Wild Land TrustSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API