Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Freedman v. Palmer Park Theater Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1956No. Docket 54, Calendar 46,371Published

1ConcurrenceBoyles, J.

I do not concur in affirmance.

This case originated in the common pleas court for Detroit and was tried before a judge of that court. Decision depended on a question of fact — was the defendant theater company guilty of negligence in failing to keep its premises in a safe condition to prevent injury to its patrons? Plaintiff was an invitee who was injured, and claims negligence of the defendant in permitting a wet, slippery substance to remain at a door leading into the ladies’ rest, room,, and a space to exist between the door and certain carpeting, causing the plaintiff to slip, catch her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hulett v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Branch v. KlattMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lane v. B & J Theatres, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Michael v. KircherMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Emery v. Midwest Amusement & Realty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API