Legal Opinion

Ballast Advisors, LLC v. Scott A. Peterson, et al.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 3, 2026No. 0:23-cv-03769Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA BALLAST ADVISORS, LLC, Case No. 23-CV-3769 (PJS/JFD) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER SCOTT A. PETERSON, et al., Defendant. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ request for fees and costs (Dkt. No. 221, Dkt. No. 226) made pursuant to the Court's June 2, 2026 Order (Dkt. No. 225). That order granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e) in part and stated that (1) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(e)(1), Defendants must reimburse plaintiff's fees and costs incurred in bringing the September 18, 2025 Motion to Compel and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Adam J. Hanig, and v. Lisa Anne Lee, and Cross-Appellee and City of Rapid City, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. JULIE PARKE, — v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, — JULIE PARKE, — v. FIRST RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, —Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API