Legal Opinion

Earl M. Coplon and Mollie M. Coplon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1960No. 13959_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners, husband and wife, deducted on their 1954 joint income tax return the sum of $4,755.61, claiming that such expenditures were “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year” in carrying on the trade or business of Earl Coplon. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the claimed deduction, asserting that the expenditures were not deductible under the provisions of Section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C.A. § 162. The Tax Court affirmed the Commissioner, concluding that, “Earl Coplon had not carried his burden of showing that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Podems v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  2. Levy v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Walliser v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Thomas v. Orvis and Bobye G. Orvis v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Dana W. Brown v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. Eriksen v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. Orvis v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API