Pickett v. Hawes
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Chickasaw District Court. Fraudulent conveyance : practice in supreme court, &G. — William Pickett (of whom the plaintiffs are the heirs and representatives) obtained in his lifetime a judgment against the defendant, John D. Hawes, sold thereon certain land claimed to belong to the said John D., and received a sheriff’s deed for the same.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Chickasaw District Court. Fraudulent conveyance : practice in supreme court, &G. — William Pickett (of whom the plaintiffs are the heirs and representatives) obtained in his lifetime a judgment against the defendant, John D. Hawes, sold thereon certain land claimed to belong to the said John D., and received a sheriff’s deed for the same. Prior to this judgment, but after the creation of the debt to Pickett, John D. conveyed the land in question to his co-defendant and father, David P. Hawes. It is also alleged, in the petition, that the defendant, Graham, held a certain tract in…
1Opinion of the CourtDillon, J.
i. pkaceS£pt¿ns°: facts. The appellants ask a trial de novo. This appellee resists because, as he claims, the whole evidence is not before this court. The evidence was sought to be embodied in a bill of exceptions. ip^jg ge^g ou£ as follows: “Plaintiff proved by sheriff’s deed that the land claimed in the petition had been deeded to him by the sheriff in pursuance of a sale made under an execution issued upon a judgment against John D. Hawes” (describing parties, date and amount of judgment). “And also proved, by abstract of title that the land described in the petition and sheriff’s deed had…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Carter v. Coharie Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912