Legal Opinion

Fields v. Woodford

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2002No. Nos. 00-99005, 00-99006PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RYMER; Concurrence by Judge SILVERMAN.

ORDER

The opinion filed February 22, 2002, and appearing at 281 F.3d 963 (9th Cir.2002), is ordered amended as follows.

281 F.3d 963, 975-976: Replace Part II.B with the following:

Fields argues that the jury improperly considered testimony by James Ma-teer, a Los Angeles police officer who was present when Fields was arrested, that the two women Fields was conversing with .at the time of his arrest were white. The details are spelled out in Part IV(A), infra. The trial judge sustained defense counsel’s objection to the prosecutor’s line of…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Thomas Porter v. David ZookCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Runningeagle v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Fields v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API