Chappuis v. Ortho Sport & Spine Physicians Savannah, LLC.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice.
This case comes to our Court at an early stage of a lawsuit stemming from the contentious relationship of two former business partners. The trial court struck 15 paragraphs of the plaintiff's complaint pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-12 (f), but the Court of Appeals reversed most of that order in Ortho Sport & Spine Physicians Savannah, LLC v. Chappuis, 344 Ga. App. 233, 808 S.E.2d 559 (2017). We granted a writ of certiorari to address how a trial court should evaluate a party's § 9-11-12 (f) motion to strike matter from a pleading on the ground that it is "scandalous." As…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Stanbury Law Firm, P.A. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Delta Consulting Group, Inc. v. R. Randle Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Abraham Alvarado-Morales v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- State v. PickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Ambler v. ArcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilkes & Mchugh, P.A. v. LTC Consulting, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Ortho Sport & Spine Physicians Savannah, LLC v. James ChappuisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- WILKES & McHUGH P.A. v. LTC CONSULTING, L.P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019