Legal Opinion
Holley v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 17, 2020No. 4:18-cv-06972Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ADRIAN HOLLEY, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06972-JST 8 Plaintiffs, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 9 v. Re: ECF Nos. 153, 154, 155 10 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., Defendant. 11 12 JAMES JONES, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05383-JST 13 Plaintiffs, Re: ECF Nos. 48, 49, 50 14 v. 15 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., 16 Defendant. 17 18 The parties recently submitted competing proposed case management schedules, ECF No. 19 153, along with briefs supporting their respective proposals, ECF Nos. 154, 155.1 There are two 20 main issues in contention: (1) whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Nlo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- In the Matter of Alex Strandell v. Jackson County, Illinois, Appeal of Thomas F. Tobin, Attorney at Law, Contemnor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Carey-Canada, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- In re Southern Ohio Correctional FacilityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.