Legal Opinion

McQueen v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1931No. 14653Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for vagrancy; penalty assessed is a fine of $20.

It was averred that the appellant was “an idle person who was able to work and had no property to support him, and who lived without any means of support and made no exertion to obtain a livelihood by honest employment.” This brings the prosecution under subdivision 3, article 607, P. C., 1925.

It was shown by the testimony of the sheriff that he had known the appellant for three or four years; that he appeared able-bodied; that the witness had not seen the appellant working for the past two or three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Painter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Senegal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Haston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Sands v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API