Legal Opinion

Dm Petroleum Operations Company v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 27, 2014No. 1:14-cv-00080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERIC G. BRUGGINK, Judge

This is a post-award bid protest of the Department of Energy’s selection of Fluor Federal Petroleum Operations, LLC (“Fluor”) as the management and operating contractor for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. The parties briefed the case on cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record, and oral argument was held on March 7, -2014. Because the agency’s decision was not arbitrary or capricious, we deny plaintiffs motion for judgment on the administrative record and grant defendant’s and intervenor’s cross-motions for judgment.

BACKGROUND

The Department of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. American Fed. of Govt. Employees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Tech Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Redland Genstar, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mvl USA Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
  2. North South Consulting Group, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Tetra Tech, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API