Legal Opinion

Faurie v. Pitot

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The plaintiff had brought suit for her dotal rights, against the defendants, syndics of her husband's estate, and obtained judgment, but no at-lowance was made to her for interest; none having been prayed: she now instituted the present Suit to recover the interest.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.,

Interest cannot be sued distinctly from the principal. It is an accessory of *84the debt, and when that is cancelled, the right to the interest is also destroyed.

Derbigny, for the plaintiff. Paillette, for the defendant.

Judgment for Defendant.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co. v. Meriwether Supply Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Motor Liens, Inc. v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Succession of MannSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
  4. Jarreau v. LudelingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1822
  5. Turner, Wilson & Co. v. McMainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877