Legal Opinion

Weary v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1994No. 93-3791PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We find that all of appellant’s points have merit. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of possessing cocaine and remand for new trial.

*157First, the trial court erred in not allowing the defense to reopen its case after a witness under subpoena left the courthouse and reappeared prior to closing arguments. The witness could have been critical to the defense upon a major point where the evidence was in sharp conflict. Delgado v. State, 573 So.2d 83, 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. Ellis, 491 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Steffanos v. State, 80 Fla. 309, 86 So.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Barry v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Steffanos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Delgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. State v. EllisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Akins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API