Weary v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We find that all of appellant’s points have merit. Accordingly, we reverse the final judgment adjudicating appellant guilty of possessing cocaine and remand for new trial.
*157First, the trial court erred in not allowing the defense to reopen its case after a witness under subpoena left the courthouse and reappeared prior to closing arguments. The witness could have been critical to the defense upon a major point where the evidence was in sharp conflict. Delgado v. State, 573 So.2d 83, 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); State v. Ellis, 491 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Steffanos v. State, 80 Fla. 309, 86 So.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Barry v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Steffanos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Delgado v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- State v. EllisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Akins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997