Rhoden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SALCINES, Judge.
Michael Rhoden entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charges of resisting law enforcement officers without violence, possession of cocaine with intent to sell, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He reserved the right to appeal the denial of his dispositive motion to suppress. In the motion, Rhoden argued that the law enforcement officers lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a “Terry Stop”1 and lacked probable cause to detain him. We reverse.
An evidentiary hearing on the motion to suppress was conducted. Testimony was presented that four “task force members” of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fitzpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Slydell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Jay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- CARTER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- R.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- State v. ChampersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013