Legal Opinion

Rand v. Monsanto Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 29, 1990No. 85 C 9087PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

We denied Mr. Rand’s motion for class certification on March 23, 1989 because of Mr. Rand’s unwillingness to pay costs, and his two motions for reconsideration on May 5, 1989 and on January 4, 1990. After our denial of class certification, we allowed Mr. Rand’s attorneys to publish a notice in order to find an adequate class representative, but no one came forward. Determined to pursue this case to the end, Mr. Rand’s attorneys have always taken the position that they would proceed to trial even though Mr. Rand’s claim was only for $1,135 plus interest…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Burton M. Abrams and Marguerite M. Abrams v. Interco IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Zimmerman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Kline v. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Moore v. HeckerDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  3. Claire Rand, Custodian for Brett Rand v. Monsanto CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API