Gose v. Brooks

WILLSON, O. J.

(dissenting) I do not agree the judgment 'should be reformed as determined by the other members of the court, but think it should be affirmed as it was rendered by the trial court. That court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are as follows:

“(1) I find that on the 1st day of January, 1920, a person representing himself to be J. R. Jordan, of Arcadia, La., and hereafter referred to as J. R. Jordan, and further representing himself to be a nephew of J. R. Jordan of said place, and a partner with him engaged in the business of buying and selling mules, went to the wagon…