Legal Opinion

City of Valparaiso v. Defler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1998No. 64A03-9704-CV-127PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal arises from a lawsuit filed by Clark and Joan Defier against the City of Valparaiso and its Board of Public Works (“City”), McMahon Associates, Inc. (“McMahon”), and Woodruff & Sons, Inc. (‘Woodruff’).1 The Defiers allege that the City, McMahon, and Woodruff, in the course of designing and constructing a sewer lift station adjacent to their property, caused their land to subside. The City filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court denied. The City raises two issues, which we have restated. McMahon and Woodruff have joined the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.Indiana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ramon v. Glenroy Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. Borne Ex Rel. Borne v. Northwest Allen County School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. St. Joseph County Police Dept. v. ShumakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Reed v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Indiana Department of Financial Institutions v. Worthington Bancshares, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API