Eustis v. Fosdick
Texas Supreme Court
Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Wilbarger County.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Associate Justioe.
—On the 15th day of August, 1882, W. G. Eustis, the plaintiff in error, conveyed by deed with clauses of general warranty, to E. E. Fosdick, the defendant in error, two surveys of 1280 acres each, which surveys were not then patented, but were subsequently patented to W. G. Eustis, assignee, in 1883. On December 5, 1883, Fosdick conveyed to Jules Alvord, by deed with clauses of general warranty, the south half of one of the 1280-acre surveys conveyed to him by Eustis. For the two surveys Fosdick paid to Eustis $1920, and for the one-half of one of the surveys Alvord…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Flaniken v. NealTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Pope v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Booth v. StarrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Withy v. MumfordNew York Supreme Court · 1825
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hollingsworth v. MexiaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Compton v. Trico Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Bonzer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Penney v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Taylor v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.