Legal Opinion

Mitchell National Bank v. Jones

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1927No. File No. 6453PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, P. J.

The plaintiff above named instituted a proceeding for mandamus against the defendant in the circuit court of Davison county, and an alternative writ issued. On the return day the defendant made a motion to. quash the alternative writ upon the grounds that the circuit court of D-avison county had no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant or the subject of the action; that the proceeding was not 'brought by the real party in interest; that the plaintiff had a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law; and that it appeared from the face of the application that neither said application nor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mueller v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Bleakley v. BarclaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. White v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  4. State v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Schilling v. MenzieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Smith v. Otter Tail Power CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Warren v. SlaybaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McDonald v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Mitchell National Bank v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API