Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Santander Consumer USA, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided February 21, 2013No. 01-12-00728-CVPublished

1ConcurrenceEvelyn V. Keyes, Justice

I respectfully concur in the denial of the petition for writ of mandamus filed by relator Santander Consumer USA, Inc. I would deny the petition on the ground that Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 51.016, allowing an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), provides Santander a plain, adequate, and complete remedy for the trial court’s allegedly wrongful denial of its motion to compel; Santander failed to timely avail itself of its remedy and therefore waived it. The majority holds— correctly, in my…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  3. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API