United States v. Cotton Valley Operators Committee
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, District Judge.
The general nature of the complaint in this case is described in the opinion filed herein on January 21, 1948 75 F.Supp 1. We now have for consideration three additional motions, to-wit: (1) By some 20 odd defendants for a more definite- statement of facts upon which the demand is founded; (2) By the Ohio Oil Co., for the production of certain documents; and (3) a motion to dismiss.
Taking these motions up in the order named (1) requests further information with respect to Articles 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, and 16 of the complaint.
The request as to paragraph 10 has been…
2Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Cotton Valley Operators CommitteeDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1949
- Assiniboine & Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation v. Calvert Exploration Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1963
- Hodgson v. Orson E. Coe Pontiac, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1971