Legal Opinion

Baxter v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 24, 1991No. 90-2749PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s conviction, but remand for resentencing and notice and hearing as to the assessment of a public defender’s fee and investigation costs.

The state concedes that appellant could not be adjudged a habitual offender as all of his prior convictions occurred on the same day. See Williams v. State, 573 So.2d 451 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

The state further concedes that the trial court improperly sentenced appellant by causing him to be “present” in court via closed circuit television. See Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

We hold that appellant should have been given…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Interest of RBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Jacobs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baxter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API