In Sik Choi v. Hyung Soo Kim Nancy Soo Lee and Golden Plastics
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Concurring in the judgmentLewis, Circuit Judge
I agree with the majority that if one were to reach the issue of whether the laws of South Korea accorded the defendant, Kim, American due process in the circumstances predicating this lawsuit, one would likely reach the conclusion the majority espouses. However, I do not think we should pursue that course. I believe that before we render an opinion which finds the legal system of a foreign sovereign wanting in that it produces judgments that do not comport with our homegrown notions of justice, prudence dictates that we determine whether what we are criticizing is in fact a “judgment” at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Republic Of The Philippines v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Knighton v. International Business MacHines Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Lafontant v. AristideDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Fischer v. KippSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.