Legal Opinion

Accomando v. Accomando (Child Custody)

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2022No. 85275Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MARIO ACCOMANDO, No. 85275 vs. Appellant, MEL,' GEORGANN ROSE ACCOMANDO, SEP 1. .0"22 • Res ondent. • ". 137 '..",s/N ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Y. DEP-MY This is a pro se appeal from a divorce decree . Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Amy Mastin, Judge. Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal was untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it was filed more than 30 days after service of written notice of entry of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Healy v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftNevada Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API