Legal Opinion
Carl Tuel v. Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 29, 2013No. 11-2140UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2Per curiam
This common law negligence dispute arises out of an accident that occurred on a construction site in Sterling, Virginia. Appellant Carl Tuel (“Tuel”) brought suit against Appellee Hertz Equipment Rental Corporation (“Hertz”) alleging Hertz owed him, as a foreseeable third party, a duty of reasonable care in performing maintenance on its leased construction equipment. Tuel alleged Hertz failed to exercise reasonable care, and, as a result, Hertz’s negligence caused Tuel physical injury…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Richmond Metropolitan Authority v. McDevitt Street Bovis, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Delk v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
- Blake Const. Co., Inc. v. AlleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- McMillan v. McMillanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
- Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx Corporation, Burris Chemical, Incorporated v. Usx CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Nelson v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2013
- Davies v. Virginia CVS Pharmacy, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2014
- WILLIAMS v. VERIZONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020