Legal Opinion

Chancey v. Citizens Bank of Eustis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 23, 1929No. 6588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. Tlis petition as amended sets out a cause of action. Tlie plaintiff has not an adequate and complete remedy at law. One of the prayers of the petition is, that all of the assets of all the branch banks of the Georgia State Bank be marshaled and be brought together and applied to all the creditors of all the branch banks, as provided by law; that the trustees named in the original petition be required to restore to the superintendent of banks the assets now in their hands; and that an accounting be had by them as to the assets disposed of, etc.

2. The petition as amended is not subject to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jolley v. HardemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gormley v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API