Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Robert D. Murgia & Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 21, 1990Published

1Opinion of the CourtFumari, J.

This is an action for breach of a contract to construct a foundation and to install thereon a prefabricated, modular home.

The plaintiffs, Fred S. and Mary S. Caruso (“Carusos”) purchased a lot of land in Haverhill, Massachusetts from the defendant, Robert D. Murgia & Co., Inc. *24(“Murgia”). Murgia contracted to excavate the lot, construct a foundation and install a ranch house/modular home purchased by the Carusos from a third party. Murgia also agreed to connect all utilities, to construct stairs and appurtenant structures and to make interior changes in the modular home.

The Carusos allege2…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Searl v. School Dist. No. 2 in Lake Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Commonwealth v. AhearnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. O'Connell v. DowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Raffel v. PerleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API