Legal Opinion

Boret v. L. Vogelstein & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The plaintiffs are copartners residing and doing business in London, Eng., and made certain written contracts with the partnership of L. Vogelstein & Co. on March 20, 1916. The defendant corporation was subsequently incorporated under the laws of the State of New York and acquired all the assets and assumed all the obligations of the former partnership of L. Vogelstein & Co., including the contracts in controversy. The contracts we will call the. smelting contract and the freight contracts, with an addendum to each, subsequently made. They are set out in full in the statement of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baker v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. City of Yonkers v. Yonkers Electric Light & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gordon v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1942
  3. Kaiser v. ZeiglerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1921
  4. Martin v. SchumacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. Whale Oil Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API