Legal Opinion
Heeran v. McNally
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 24, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMcNamee, J.
On the argument of this application both sides admitted that judgment on the pleadings should be granted, and each asks for that judgment.
A mandamus directing the city clerk and corporation counsel to prepare a proposition and abstract for the purpose of submitting the local law to the electorate has been granted (135 Misc. 874). A temporary injunction has been granted herein restraining the payment of the salaries in question during the pendency of this action. The question to be disposed of here has not been before the court, as the question whether this action could be maintained does not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. McLaughlin v. Board of Police CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Smith v. . the Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Greene v. . KnoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Olmsted v. . MeahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Peck v. . BelknapNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heeran v. McNallyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930