In re the Estate of Blumenthal
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Frankenthaler, S.
The respondent in this discovery proceeding admits possession of property belonging to decedent’s estate. The sole objection to the demand for a turnover of the property rests in respondent’s contention that, Dutch taxing authorities having issued an “ attachment ” against the property in question, this court must pass upon the validity of the attachment or await a release thereof before directing a turnover. This court is not the appropriate tribunal in which to test the validity of a tax decree by a foreign taxing authority. Assuming the validity of the tax ,the courts of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Moore v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State of Colorado v. . HarbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Moore v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- In re the Estate of BaerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Green v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1961
- In re the Accounting of Irving Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950