Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Blumenthal

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 9, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankenthaler, S.

The respondent in this discovery proceeding admits possession of property belonging to decedent’s estate. The sole objection to the demand for a turnover of the property rests in respondent’s contention that, Dutch taxing authorities having issued an “ attachment ” against the property in question, this court must pass upon the validity of the attachment or await a release thereof before directing a turnover. This court is not the appropriate tribunal in which to test the validity of a tax decree by a foreign taxing authority. Assuming the validity of the tax ,the courts of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Moore v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. State of Colorado v. . HarbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Moore v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. In re the Estate of BaerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Green v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1961
  2. In re the Accounting of Irving Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API