Legal Opinion · Dissent

Local Union No. 1992, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. The Okonite Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 17, 1999No. 98-6194Published

1DissentRosenn, Circuit Judge

Plaintiff Local 1992 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (“Local 1992” or “the Union”) and defendant, The Okonite Company (“Okonite”), both argue that the severance agreement that they bargained for is unambiguous. The District Court held that the contract was unambiguous. Because in my opinion there is only one reasonable interpretation of the severance agreement, I agree. Unlike the District Court, however, I believe that Ok-onite advances the only reasonable interpretation — employees waived their rights to sue Okonite as a condition of receiving severance pay.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API