Legal Opinion

Nash v. Pulaski Cty. Cir. Ct.dissent

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 2017No. CV-17-54Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2017 Ark. 73

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-17-54 JIM R. NASH Opinion Delivered March 2, 2017 APPELLANT V. PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT DISSENTING OPINION ON DENIAL OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS. APPELLEE JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Justice The majority believes that Mr. Nash has an adequate remedy at law, i.e., an appeal. After dissecting the complex procedural history of this case, it appears that an appeal would not be available. Thus, I dissent from the denial of petitioner Jim R. Nash’s petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Pulaski County Circuit Judge Chris Piazza to appoint a special…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. VittitowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API