Fisk v. Hobern
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
H. T. Kellogg, Acting P. J.:
It is conceivable that testimony might be offered upon the trial tending to prove that the father of the plaintiff was the owner of a certain team of horses; that the defendants, Joseph Hobern and Frank Hobern, were the owners of chattel mortgages consti*589tuting liens upon the team; that the mortgage debts were due and unpaid; that such defendants, acting under the terms of their mortgages and within the law, obtained possession of the team; that the plaintiff, in concert with his father, attempted to retake the team and repossess his father therewith; that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Collins v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Demick v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Rockwell v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Lansingh v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1854
3Cited by2 opinions
- Home Insurance v. T. A. Gillespie Loading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Todd Drydock & Repair Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948