Legal Opinion

Fisk v. Hobern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

H. T. Kellogg, Acting P. J.:

It is conceivable that testimony might be offered upon the trial tending to prove that the father of the plaintiff was the owner of a certain team of horses; that the defendants, Joseph Hobern and Frank Hobern, were the owners of chattel mortgages consti*589tuting liens upon the team; that the mortgage debts were due and unpaid; that such defendants, acting under the terms of their mortgages and within the law, obtained possession of the team; that the plaintiff, in concert with his father, attempted to retake the team and repossess his father therewith; that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Collins v. . ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Demick v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  3. Rockwell v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. Lansingh v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. T. A. Gillespie Loading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Todd Shipyards Corp. v. Todd Drydock & Repair Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API