Conner v. Bludworth
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the defendants, in the Sixteenth District Court, County of Kern. Reed, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 2, Myrick, J.:
Plaintiff alleges that on July 17th, 1878, he held and was in possession of certain lands, describing them, and of the growing crop of wheat thereon; that while he was in the possession and entitled to the possession of said land and growing crop, defendants, against the will of plaintiff, willfully and unlawfully entered into and upon said land, and took possession of said growing crop, and without the consent of plaintiff and against his will did unlawfully cut said crop, and take and keep possession thereof; that plaintiff was and is the owner and entitled to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Reynolds v. FitzpatrickMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Quarles v. HuchersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
- Peerless Insurance & Brokerage Co. v. Dwyer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.