Legal Opinion
Cambridge State Bank v. Roemer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1990No. C0-89-2097Published
1Opinion of the Court
457 N.W.2d 716 (1990)
CAMBRIDGE STATE BANK, et al., Norwest Bank Duluth, National Association (formerly First National Bank of Duluth), Respondents,
v.
Arthur C. ROEMER, Commissioner, Department of Revenue, and the State of Minnesota, Appellants.
No. C0-89-2097.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 20, 1990.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen. and Thomas R. Muck, Deputy Atty. Gen., Tax Litigation Div., St. Paul, for appellants.
Robert J. Schnell, Jr. and Walter A. Pickhardt, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for Norwest Bank Duluth.
Christopher J. Dietzen, Andrew J. Mitchell, Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bacchus Imports, Ltd. v. DiasSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Commission of Webster Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.