Legal Opinion

Op. Atty. Gen. 3a; 390a6

Minnesota Attorney General Reports

Decided December 12, 2025Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHERIFFS; DUTIES AND AUTHORITY; Minnesota law does not authorize sheriffs to enter agreements under section 287(g) of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. Instead, a county may execute a 287(g) agreement if the agreement is approved by a resolution of the county board of commissioners; Minnesota law prohibits local law enforcement officers from detaining or holding persons based solely on ICE civil immigration detainers regardless of whether the law enforcement agency is operating under a valid 287(g) agreement. 3-a; 390a6 December 12, 2025 John J. Choi Ramsey County Attorney 360…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API