Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Wetz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1952No. 2213PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MILLER. J:

This is an original action in mandamus brought by the plaintiffs as abutting property owners and taxpayers seeking an order requiring defendants as Trustees of Van Burén Township, (1) to maintain, (2) to keep in good repair, (3) to keep from obstruction by snow, and (4) to cause to be dragged in accordance with §3375 GC, the roads enumerated in the petition, the names of which are not here important.

The petition alleges that portions of two of the roads enumerated are improved and other parts are graveled or unim*283proved, and that the others are all unimproved; that said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. Oakwood (Vil.)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Staples v. SheetsOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clements v. Trustees of Monroe TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Hi-Land Apartments, Inc. v. City of HillsboroOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API