Legal Opinion

Diebold v. Diebold

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1924No. 10,801PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen

This is an action, for divorce. It was tried in the absence of defendant and his counsel. Findings in favor of *558plaintiff were made and filed. Thereafter defendant’s motion to vacate such findings were overruled. Defendant brings the case here and asks that the writ of error be made a supersedeas.

There has been no final judgment entered in this case. The findings of fact and conclusions of law cannot take the place of a final judgment so as to make the proceedings leading thereto now reviewable. Hobbs v. Hobbs, 72 Colo. 190, 210 Pac. 398. There is no temporary alimony complained of. There has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. HobbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Unzicker v. UnzickerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vandy's, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Burks v. MaudlinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  3. Kourbetis v. Natl. Copper Bank of Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Turnbull v. BrownMontana Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API