Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 4, 2014No. 2013AP1578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrennan, J.

¶ 1 Thomas Mayo and James Hayslett appeal from the circuit court's order dismissing their complaint against Jimmy D. Boyd. The circuit court dismissed the complaint because Mayo and Hayslett purportedly failed to strictly comply with the time-of-the-event requirement set forth in Wis. Stat. § 893.82(3) (2011-12).1 Because we conclude that § 893.82(3) cannot reasonably be read to require a plaintiff to provide the State with notice of the exact time of the event giving rise to a claim when doing so is almost impossible, we reverse and remand back to the circuit court for further proceedings.

BAC…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
  3. Beloit Liquidating Trust v. GradeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Riccitelli v. BroekhuizenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Responsible Use of Rural & Agricultural Land v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moya v. Aurora Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2015
  2. Stelpflug v. Rural Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API