Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stevenson v. Stoufer

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 8, 1946No. 46736Published

1DissentOliver, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent.

The Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C. App., section 901 et seq., forbids overcharges of rent in certain areas and, at the time here in question, permitted the person overcharged to bring a statutory action either for $50 (for each overcharge-) or for treble the amount of the overcharge, whichever was the greater. In other words, the statute provides for accumulative damages, to the individual plaintiff, based upon the damage to his property rights.

Although not here directly involved, it should be noted that the Emergency Price Control Act…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  4. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API