Legal Opinion
Diamond v. Bland
California Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1974No. L.A. 30190PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
In 1970 this* court decided the case of Diamond v. Bland, 3 Cal.3d 653 [91 Cal.Rptr. 501, 477 P.2d 733], in which we held that plaintiff was entitled to solicit signatures on an initiative petition and to distribute leaflets regarding the proposal at defendant’s shopping center. Two years later, the United States Supreme Court determined in Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551 [33 L.Ed.2d 131, 92 S.Ct. 2219], that the owners of a shopping center in Oregon had the right to prohibit the distribution of political handbills unrelated to the operation of the shopping center. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. Logan Valley Plaza, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- In Re HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- In re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- SHAD Alliance v. Smith Haven MallNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.