Legal Opinion

Samuel A. Dina v. Attorney General of the United States and Director of the United States Information Agency

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 17, 1986No. 1008, Docket 85-6300Published

1Opinion of the Court

793 F.2d 473

Samuel A. DINA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES and Director of the

United States Information Agency, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 1008, Docket 85-6300.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued March 31, 1986.

Decided June 17, 1986.

Ronald W. Freeman, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Noel Anne Ferris, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., Michael Patrick, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Jane E. Booth, Asst. U.S. Atty., Joseph A. Blundon, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Carol B. Epstein, Atty.-Adviser, U.S. Information…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Silverman v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. Abdelhamid v. IlchertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Samuel A. Dina v. Attorney General of the United States and Director of the United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API