Legal Opinion
In re Van Rooy
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 2, 1937No. 39142PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEST, District Judge.
The H.O.L.C. mortgage did not' convey the rents of the real estate, but provided : “Upon default * * * it shall be lawful for the second party at the option of the said'second party, to enter into and upon the real estate hereby granted or any part thereof, and to receive all rents, issues and profits thereof, and if any proceeding shall be brought to foreclose this mortgage or to collect the principal and interest * * * the court may upon application at any time during the pendency of said proceedings, appoint a receiver and take possession * * * of said real estate and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re BroseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- In Re HumestonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re WakeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
- Associated Co. v. GreenhutCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- In Re BerdickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Prichard Plaza Associates Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Bernards v. BeckOregon Supreme Court · 1941