State v. Ralph
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge
Introduction
Matthew- Ralph (Ralph) appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He challenges the trial court’s admission of hearsay evidence and asserts error in the trial court’s imposition of an enhanced sentence under the prior and persistent offender statutes. We affirm.
Background
The State of Missouri' (State) charged Ralph as a prior and persistent offender *676with the class C felony of possession of a controlled substance, Hydrocodone. The evidence at the 2016 jury trial showed the following, viewed in a light…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. JustusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State of Missouri v. Chadwick Leland WalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- State v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. GibbsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- B.K. v. Mo. State Highway PatrolMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. JUSTIN P. GILLERMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020