Legal Opinion

Kramer v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1900PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCLOTH, C. J., and FURCHES, J., dissenting. This case was disposed of at the last term of this Court by a per curiam, order affirming the judgment below, which was in favor of the defendant. A petition by the plaintiff to rehear was allowed, and the case is again before us for our reconsideration. The action was brought by the mother of the child, as his administratrix, under sec. 1498 of The Code, to recover compensation for the pecuniary (329) injury resulting from the death. The plaintiff in her complaint alleged that the defendant owed the public and her intestate the duty of keeping…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Doyle v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Williams v. BoldingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Emery v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Ferrell v. Dixie Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API