Legal Opinion

Russ v. Destival

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 5, 2004No. Record 030892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser

The sole question in this appeal is whether a jury instruction stating that a bicyclist has a duty to refrain from entering or crossing an intersection in disregard of “close or approaching” traffic is an inaccurate statement of law. In light of the plain terms of Code § 46.2-924(B), we answer that question in the affirmative and thus conclude that the circuit court erred in granting the instruction.

Howell Russ, the appellant, filed a motion for judgment against James Destival, the appellee, claiming damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of an accident that occurred at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. CARSON BY MEREDITH v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  2. Cofield v. NucklesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  3. Hooker v. HancockSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Rhoades v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
  5. Hopson v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lake v. AdamsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API