Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 7, 1995No. 94-2094Published

1Opinion of the Court

CONFESSION OF ERROR

2Per curiam

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for postconviction relief because the defendant was sentenced to consecutive habitual offender sentences for two offenses arising out of a single criminal episode. See Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Henry v. State, 644 So.2d 571 (Fla.2d DCA 1994); Dietrich v. State, 635 So.2d 148 (Fla.2d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse the defendant’s consecutive habitual felony offender sentences in case number 90-2400, and…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Dietrich v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Henry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API