Legal Opinion · Dissent

Abbott v. Danforth

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 11, 1937Published

1DissentDunn, C. J.

After testator’s own death, his mother having predeceased him, the frame of his last will, which the Probate Court took proof and allowed, gave his property to his brother, Charles, for life, with re*182stricted power of disposal. Testator does not provide a remainder, but merely disposes of one, should it exist, the devise being “to my legal heirs according to their legal rights,” in fee simple.

There is a remainder. The question for decision is whether testator’s intention, as expressed in his will, defines a limitation which, as it affects ascertainment of his “legal heirs,” excludes his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Forbes v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Minot v. TappanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Cushman v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Chesman v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Rotch v. RotchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API